![]() ![]() ![]() tracks above and below a virtual centreline as is the case with Resolve, Premiere Pro, Avid Media Composer etc. Neither NLE separates the video and audio into separate V1, V2, V3 and A1, A2, A3 etc.Tracks in VPX a multi-purpose and make no distinction between type - however, if a video with audio is dropped onto the timeline the default is to make a single track with both the video and audio (this can be switched to creating a video track and a separate audio track in the preferences).There are more "presets" in VPX for text effects, motion effects and transition effects, but if you're not into presets and are happy creating your own then that's a bit of a moot point!.no random so4compoundplug-type issues - but like all NLEs it has various bugs (just look at the forum for them) VPX tends to need less user intervention to make things "work", i.e.Vegas makes better use of AMD graphics hardware (for acceleration and decode/encode etc.), for NVidia and Intel I think both are pretty similar.drag-and-drop interface, tweaking FX on the preview etc.) where Vegas often has input boxes for things (although there are plenty of examples of GUI-based things in Vegas and textbox entry in VPX) VPX tends to be more GUI-based for things like FX, Colour-Grading etc.Both NLEs use OFX, but vendors have to "enable" use of the OFX package in a given NLE - they do this for Vegas as a matter of course, but some don't for VPX!.Vegas allows FX to be applied at the clip, track or master level, VPX is only at clip level as far as I remember (but it does have a couple of "Master FX" for output colour-correction etc.).VPX runs with an internal 16-bit colour (as of the most recent versions) vs selectable 8-bit or 32-bit in Vegas.VPX generates background proxies for faster playback perfectly with no user intervention necessary (although you can tweak various settings if you want).There is no obvious way to re-order effects in VPX - if you want to change the order it's a case of deleting all of the effects on a clip and putting them back in the way you now want them.They perform a similar role, but some of the differences I can think of off the top of my head (in no particular order): I've used both VPX8+10 and Vegas Pro 15+16 (amongst other NLEs too). Since I do not want to be biased and just suggest the software I am familiar with, Vegas Pro, I want clear pros and cons for both Video Pro X and Vegas Pro. But, based on the pricing alone, I think EricLNZ is right and Vegas Pro ($349) is the closest alternative to Video Pro X ($399). Since they will be using it professionally, I think suggesting to start with a cheaper or a consumer based NLE like Fastcut Plus, Movie Edit Pro or even Vegas Movie Studio is not a good idea.Īlso, I am not talking here about extras like bundled software and plugins, I am talking mainly about the core NLE, that is why I did not initially mention Vegas Pro, Vegas 365 or Vegas Pro Suite. My question is for newcomers who want to start with one NLE and keep using it until they master it with no intention to switch to another NLE. I have been a Vegas Pro user since its first version so obviously I prefer it over all other NLE because I am already familiar with it and find it very easy to use. At the 25$US level, get Vegas Pro 15 Edit, DVD Architect, Vegas Movie Studio, SoundForge Audio Studio 12, and more.Įdit: Here are a couple of threads on the same topic: There is a HumbleBundle deal on for Vegas presently that is hard to beat. You mention "regardless of price" but presently, I would say that it's a no brainer. ![]() After a couple of years, maybe look at stepping up. It takes a lot of work just to get familiar with these. The question is, what all would the new user expect to do with the program?įor a new user who has never edited video before, I would suggest Vegas Movie Studio or Movie Edit Pro Plus or Premium. Being used to VPX, I have trouble getting my head around Vegas (it not as simple as users claim). I use VPX and Magix Movie Edit Pro Premium but have Vegas Pro 15. Even then, you won't see many of the lesser known features of each. Unfortunately, there is no comparison list, so you have to go through the details of each on the Magix site. They each have things that the other doesn't do or does better. Video Pro X (VPX) is not exactly the equivalent of Vegas Pro. You're asking on the Vegas forum, so you're bound to get biased replies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |